Cit vs suresh chandra mittal
WebJul 26, 2001 · CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal – Supreme Court of India TG Team Income Tax - Judiciary Download PDF 26 Jul 2001 9,245 Views 0 comment Case Law Details … WebMar 18, 2024 · In Suresh Chandra Mittal's case (supra) the Court came out with an epoch-making ruling, viz., if an assessee files a revised …
Cit vs suresh chandra mittal
Did you know?
Web1 day ago · However, the AO initiated penalty proceeding under section 271 (1) (c) of the Act for concealment of income and finally levied the penalty which was also confirmed by the learned CIT (A). 10.1 It is a settled position of law that the penalty proceedings are different from assessment proceedings. WebJul 6, 2016 · The Hon'ble Supreme Court has in fact confirmed the order of Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal in which Hon'ble High Court had held that in this case the surrender was made after persistent queries made by the AO. Still, it was held by the Court that no penalty should be leived.
WebSir Shadilal Sugar and General Mills Ltd vs. CIT (1987) 168 ITR 705 (SC) CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) Even after proviso to explanation 1, voluntary surrender to buy peace penalty u/ s 271 (1) (c) can not be levied. Ramnath Jaganath vs. State of Maharashtra(1984) 57 STC 46,51 (Bom), WebJul 20, 1999 · vs Suresh Chandra Mittal on 20 July, 1999 Equivalent citations: 2000 241 ITR 124 MP Author: B Khan-Bench: B Khan, S Singh JUDGMENT B.A. Khan, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has made this reference and has filed statement of the case, for opinion of this court on the following question :
Webcit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax F: Deleration in Annexure v F: Applicability of GST F: Switching Over From Regular to Composition Scheme F: Input … WebAug 12, 2024 · The assessee has relied on the following judgment. “Sale consideration offered for tax on receipt of notice u/s. 148 to buy peace of mind. Not proved by department that explanation of assessee was not bona fide Suresh Chandra Mittal relied SLP of dept dismissed In the case of CIT V/s. 1. Rajiv Garg 2. Siya Ram Garg 3. Sanjay Garg 4.
Webvi. CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal(2000) 241 ITR 124 (MP) 2.2. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The facts, in brief, are that a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was carried out at the business premises of M/s Etco Group as well as at the
WebJan 30, 2024 · CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) CIT vs. SAS pharmaceuticals (2011) 335 ITR 0259 (Del) CIT vs. Pushpendra Surana (2013) 96 DTR 0231 (Raj) In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the concealment penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). underswap undyne takes actionWebMar 12, 2009 · Suresh Chandra Mittal, [2001] 251 ITR 9/119 Taxman 433, has upheld the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Suresh … thousands locked in disney locationWebcase of SureshChandra Mittal vs. CIT (Supra), the Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the assessment was made by the Revenue and once the assessing authorities had failed to take any objection in the matter of surrender of income made by the assessee in his revised return, the explanation that he had underswap sans theme mweh heh hehWebApr 24, 2015 · In case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of … under table lights for weddingWebAfter going through the letter of the ITO, the CIT (Appeals) held that Lotus Mills Ltd. would get a heavy refund from the Income Tax Department and it would be in a position to … thousands more rollbacks here to stayWebIn Suresh Chandra Goyal (Supra), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi observed: "59. Thus, when one party gives a security to the other, implicit in the said transaction is the … thousands lose jobsWebThe Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chand Mittal, 251 ITR 9 (SC) held that in a case where the assessee originally filed return showing meager income, but after action u/s.132 in response to notice u/s.148, the assessee filed revised return showing higher income and the eventual assessments were based on such return, penalty … under table cloth pad